News story: Mother guilty of murdering disabled son

Hi Everyone..

Did you see this story today? I know it isn't about autism specifically but it does involve disability so I'd be really interested to hear your thoughts. I imagine there may be mixed views..

Nia

Mother guilty of murdering disabled son

Guardian (The)  21-Jan-2010
Mother guilty of murdering disabled son. . Frances Inglis insisted throughout the trial that she was innocent because she had killed her son with love in her heart, and not malice. She was given a life sentence at the Old Bailey and told she must spend a minimum of nine years in jail. Photograph: Hertfordshire Police/PA The mother of a severely disabled 22-year-old man was today convicted of ­murder...

Yes I had seen this. It's the second case I've seen in the last week of a mother killing a child.

I'm not sure what I think...I know that people have their reasons for doing things like this, and none of us can really understand what thoughts are behind actions like these, as we don't walk in those shoes.

But I can understand why the mothers are punished - if they weren't, then it would set a standard that it's ok to do this in our society. My heart goes out to all involved, as well as jurors and the people trying the case.

Yeah I saw it too, I didn't really read up on it to offer a detailed response but I would say that I couldn't imagine having to see your child in a lot of pain & or laying like a vegtable in a bed with no sign of life so maybe living with such a thing could drive you to consider carrying out such an awful act to your own child.  I would say that the authorities are more to blame then the mother as I imagine she was very isolated & not offered the help & support she so clearly needed.

I have always agreed with people being able to decide if they want to end their own life when they have a terminal illness etc & think the law should be changed over here to allow this so its done in a proper way within correct guidelines.  I guess one of the main difficulties with a case like this is the son was in no condition to choose his own fate & the mother decided for him which would obviously never become law for this to be allowed.

I will say though I have no idea what it would be like to decide you wanted to take a lethal injection for yourself or to give your child one but I know when I had to have my dog put down, I held him in my arms while the injection was put in & I felt the life drain out of him until I was holding him dead, it was an absolutely awful experience & I couldn't imagine holding my child (no matter what quality of life they have) whilst the same thing was done.  I think like Elena, my thoughts go out to all involved in this & similar cases. 

Tracy - Community Champion

 

I noticed today in the Metro that both of the recent cases have been tried now, and two very different results:

"Kay Gilderdale was given a 12-month conditional discharge after admitting the assisted suicide of the 31-year-old ME sufferer Lynn. Jurors acquitted her in less than two hours in what trial judge Mr Justice Bean described as a victory for 'common sense, decency and humanity'."  It went on to say, "The not guilty verdict 'properly reflects the selfless actions my mother took', said her son, Steve, outside Lewes Crown Court."

And in a separate article, "Inglis was convicted of murder last Wednesday and jailed for a minimum of nine years."

Interesting....

Was both cases tried in England Elena, I don't know why I thought one was abroad? 

Tracy - Community Champion

 

Hmm, I thought so but I could be wrong. I don't have the paper any longer but I think it said that due to the very different outcomes of the cases there are now campaigners who want to perhaps revisit the law on this issue.

I think these sort of cases & laws always will come up from time to time but I don't think they'll ever be a big change in the law with regards to issues like these 

Tracy - Community Champion

 

It's a very tricky issue...!

I watched my grandmother die on request in hospital by not having food and water.  It took her a painful 3 weeks.

 I would not wish this upon anyone and being now the mother of a autistic child am very aware that she will face incredible hardship from people outside of the family and friends.

I cannot imagine the suffering this mother had daily when she had committed her life to helping those less fortunate.  Surely she would be able to judge more than most, especially those on the jury, what her son was going through.

This country needs to get real and have a better system for lethal injection.  Its about time the subject was properly debated.  People are living longer these days and I don't think all are enjoying it.  Surely in this day and age we deserve more choice.  After all we allow abortion.

Family matters are difficult to explain to the outside world, and I think you've really pointed out something key here which is that people will go through incredible hardship from others who are not involved in the decision.

 

I heard lots of debate about these two cases last week. One thing I heard which I thought was interesting was that people have the right to die by refusing food and water - but as debbienorris said - this is a very slow and painful way whereas as the two mothers in the two cases last week used very quick and pain free methods, but those are illegal. I think a big factor is the difference between choosing to die yourself or taking that decision for someone else, as Tracey already said. It will be interesting to see if these two high profile cases will bring about a change in the law...

 

Nia Charpentier

TreeHouse Staff