Clara Claiborne Park obituary
Posted by
damo73
on 9th August 2010
at 22:41
Hello Elena,
Yes - I was aware of her + she was a good campaigner from what I know of her. It is interesting as Dr. Ivor Lovaas died recently too - he isn't being remembered quite so fondly by everyone though. The two deaths have sparked off some good discussions about the social etiquette of speaking ill or not of the dead etc. (a social rule that seems quite illogical to many on the spectrum it seems - including myself).
Damian - Community Champion
Posted by
Elena - former Community Manager
on 10th August 2010
at 08:48
Hi Damian, just out of curiosity would you explain what you mean when you say that the social etiquette of speaking about the dead is illogical to you and others on the spectrum? This hasn't come up and I wasn't aware..
Posted by
damo73
on 10th August 2010
at 09:39
Hello Elena,
I have often come into problems with social etiquette - I tend to look at things logically and quite often social etiquette doesn't seem to make logical sense. It seems some others I have spoken too on the spectrum have a similar issue.
Some examples - eating with one's mouth shut (makes logical sense - eating with mouth open risks food falling out and is a bit unsightly and noisy) // Not putting elbows on table at dinner (makes logical sense if someone is close to you at the table - yet not otherwise - is it really that unsightly to people + if so - why?).
When it comes to the issue of speaking ill of the dead - many on the spectrum cannot figure why people suddenly have a collective amnesia of all the bad things people had done before they had died - when evaluating their contribution to society etc. - many I have spoken too have got into trouble at funerals for saying something honest about a person, that they would have been able to say a few days earlier (personally, at such things I tend not to say much at all). If you were more than willing to speak ill of someone when they were alive - why not when they are dead? The classic answer is that: 'they are not hear to answer you back' - this is illogical though as many wouldn't have answered you and your queries when they were alive (and thus death doesn't change the fact that they had never engaged with you in the first place etc.). The only exceptions seem to be those depicted as extreme monsters (and the reverse is often true - that only the negative is then remembered) - e.g. Hitler etc. - even in this case there are strange people who wish to forget his negative actions.
Social etiquette is sold as easing social interactions and framing norms etc. - all too often to me, it comes across as mad traditionalism, adherence to conformity in the face of all logical explanation and reasoning, playing power games of cultural capital and is ultimately classist etc. - and it often segregates people rather than integrates them.
An interesting case is saying 'please' and 'thankyou' - I can see some sense to such words (although very 'fluffy') - problem is - many societies have no equivalent word - this is not to say they lack social etiquette of their own though - then when in Britian and they forget to say these words or do not see the need for them to please others - they are often viewed as rude (which then leads to more confusion). It is all made worse by the 'natural attitude' (although there are good reasons for the existence of this - it causes all kinds of problems - see other posts + Harold Garfinkel etc.).
Damian - Community Champion
Posted by
Elena - former Community Manager
on 10th August 2010
at 12:43
I see, thank you for explaining.
I often wonder the same things about why people tend to fall into "collective amnesia" (love that term!) about the not so nice things people did while they were alive. The only answer I can come to in my mind is that it's part of the grieving process for some people. They may try to focus on the positives as a mechanism for coming to terms with the loss of a loved one. I've seen it in my own family - a family member passed and I actually heard the words "she was a saint" come out of the mouth of another family member who hadn't even been on speaking terms with the deceased for many years - now that was strange!!
I like thinking about the cultural differences in social etiquette. Even after nearly 7 years here in the UK, I still find myself wanting to show respect to others by saying "Yes sir" "Yes ma'am" or "No ma'am" or "Thank you sir". There doesn't seem to be an equivalent in British society and I think it's a very nice, subtle way of showing respect. Oh dear...when I first moved here I said "Thank you ma'am" to a young lady on an EasyJet flight. She looked like she wanted to punch me in the face! I guess 'ma'am' is short for 'madam' and that means she thought I was calling her 'old' or something.
Posted by
damo73
on 10th August 2010
at 21:49
I can see what you mean about grieving - yet the effect of 'collective amnesia' also shows up in the media and from the public - I think a major turning point in Britain was the death of Princess Diana, before this event, collective grieving and promoting positives didn't seem to happen to such an extent. I do not see much point in grieving for someone who had no real connection to you - all part of the fragmented post-modern experience I guess (although America probably did it first with Elvis) - I guess they are grieving a symbol of their collective cultural consciousness - although I don't tend to read such symbols in quite the same way.
The words 'sir' and 'ma'am' would have originated in Britain (or at least Europe I think) and yet seem to have died out as customs. I was treated in this way by a cashier in a railway station cafe the other week - I found it to be a nice surprise. The difference was - he meant it and genuinely respected others. Words can be meaningless (or deliberately obtrusive) without genuine intent.
Damian - Community Champion
Posted by
Elena - former Community Manager
on 11th August 2010
at 16:23
You're right, the media does this!
Like you, I can't understand grieving for someone who had no connection to me. I might feel a little sad, but I wouldn't be likely to join the masses in their mourning.
That was a really refreshing bit of niceness that you experienced in the cafe. I love little surprises like that!
Posted by
damo73
on 11th August 2010
at 20:14
Yes it was nice, makes the day a bit better when things like that happen.
Damian - Community Champion
Posted by
michaelz
on 6th September 2010
at 12:35
clara was mentioned on radio 4's `last words` - obit paired up with another `expert`..
this was the week before last but i forgot to post about it.
audio currently still available.
...Dr Ivar Lovaas - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ole_Ivar_Lovaas - who developed a controversial treatment based on encouraging desired behaviour and punishing unwanted behaviour and Clara Claiborne Park who wrote an influential book about the pressures facing the parents of autistic children...



![SiftGroups.com [opens in a new window]](themes/zen/treehouse/images/siftGroupsLogo.gif)
Posted by
Elena - former Community Manager
on 9th August 2010
at 11:55
I came across this today, and thought you all might like to know of this woman. I had never heard of her.
Clara Claiborne Park, who has died aged 86, was a pioneering American autism campaigner, author and teacher, best known for two books, The Siege and Exiting Nirvana, in which she described raising her daughter Jessica. She was one of the first parents to have the courage to share her experiences with others and, through her books, provided families and professionals with a greater understanding of what it can be like to bring up a child with autism.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/aug/04/clara-claiborne-park-obituary